ejeai Open Access Journal

European Journal of Emerging Artificial Intelligence

eISSN: Applied
Publication Frequency : 2 Issues per year.

  • Peer Reviewed & International Journal
Table of Content
Issues (Year-wise)
Loading…

Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Graph Neural Networks: A Foundational Guide for the Applied ML Engineer

1 Department of Computer Engineering Nordwell Institute of Technology, Finland

https://doi.org/10.64917/

Citations: Loading…
ABSTRACT VIEWS: 15   |   FILE VIEWS: 2   |   PDF: 2   HTML: 0   OTHER: 0   |   TOTAL: 17
Views + Downloads (Last 90 days)
Cumulative % included

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a powerful class of deep learning models designed to handle the complexities of graph-structured data. Their ability to learn from relational information has led to state-of-the-art performance on a wide array of tasks, from social network analysis to molecular chemistry. However, for machine learning engineers new to this domain, the steep learning curve and the sheer variety of GNN architectures can be daunting. This article provides a comprehensive introduction to GNNs, grounding the discussion in the intuitive encoder-decoder framework. We focus on three foundational GNN architectures—Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN), GraphSAGE, and Graph Attention Networks (GATv2)—to build a concrete understanding of their mechanisms. Through a series of extensive experiments on thirteen homogeneous graph datasets, we systematically investigate how GNN performance is influenced by fundamental graph properties, particularly homophily, and varying training conditions. We compare these models against established baselines, including Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP) and DeepWalk, to highlight the unique advantages of GNNs. Our findings reveal that architectural choices are critical; more flexible models like GraphSAGE excel on low-homophily graphs, whereas simpler, more rigid models like GCN are highly effective on high-homophily graphs, especially in low-data regimes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that hyperparameter tuning offers the most significant performance gains in moderately difficult learning scenarios. By combining theoretical explanations with empirical evidence and qualitative analyses of the GNN learning process, this work serves as a practical and accessible starting point for engineers looking to effectively develop and deploy GNNs.


Keywords

Graph neural networks, Graph representation learning, Deep learning, Encoder-decoder models, Node classification

References

[1] P. W. Battaglia, J. B. Hamrick, V. Bapst, A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, V. Zambaldi, M. Malinowski, A. Tacchetti, D. Raposo, A. Santoro, R. Faulkner et al., “Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01261, 2018.

[2] W. L. Hamilton, “Graph representation learning,” Synthesis Lectures on Artifical Intelligence and Machine Learning, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–159, 2020.

[3] I. Chami, S. Abu-El-Haija, B. Perozzi, C. R´e, and K. Murphy, “Machine learning on graphs: A model and comprehensive taxonomy,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 23, no. 89, pp. 1–64, 2022.

[4] M. M. Bronstein, J. Bruna, T. Cohen, and P. Veliˇckovi´c, “Geometric deep learning: Grids, groups, graphs, geodesics, and gauges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.13478, 2021.

[5] L. Wu, P. Cui, J. Pei, L. Zhao, and X. Guo, “Graph neural networks: foundation, frontiers and applications,” in Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2022, pp. 4840–4841.


How to Cite

Graph Neural Networks: A Foundational Guide for the Applied ML Engineer. (2025). European Journal of Emerging Artificial Intelligence, 2(02), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.64917/

Share Link