European Journal of Emerging Dental Research
A-Z Journals

An In Vitro Assessment of Chromatic Stability in Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and A Bioactive Alkasite Restorative Material

Authors
  • Dr. Selina M. Ravouri

    School of Media and Social Influence, Tenovar University of Civic Studies, Suva, Fiji
    Author
  • Dr. Hakim L. Dervani

    Institute of Political Behavior and Digital Society, Loranta College of Public Affairs, Georgetown, Guyana
    Author
Keywords:
Color stability, Resin-modified glass ionomer, Cention N, Bioactive restorative material
Abstract

Background: We all want our dental fillings to look good and last a long time, right? Well, this lab study was all about checking how well two common tooth-colored filling materials—a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and a newer, "bioactive" material called Cention N—hold their color when exposed to everyday drinks that can cause stains.

Materials and Methods: We made 60 small, disc-shaped samples (like tiny coins, 8mm wide and 2mm thick), half from RMGIC and half from Cention N. First, we took a baseline color reading for each using a special color-measuring device. Then, we split the samples into four groups (10 of each material per group). For 7 days, we soaked them in either plain distilled water (our control group), coffee, tea, or cola. After the soaking period, we took a final color reading and calculated how much the color had changed (ΔE). To figure out if the differences were significant, we used a statistical test called a two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's HSD test (with a significance level of 0.05).

Results: What we found was pretty clear: both the type of material and the type of drink significantly affected how much the color changed (P<0.001 for both). There was even a significant interaction, meaning how each material reacted to a drink was unique (P<0.001). Cention N consistently showed less color change (lower ΔE values) across all the staining drinks compared to RMGIC (P<0.01). Coffee was the biggest culprit for staining both materials, followed by tea, and then cola. RMGIC's color changes were noticeable (above the clinically acceptable threshold of 3.3) for all the staining drinks, but Cention N stayed below this threshold for cola.

Conclusion: So, within the limits of our lab setup, Cention N proved to be better at keeping its color stable than RMGIC. The drinks we consume definitely play a big role in how much our fillings stain, with coffee being the worst offender. This suggests that Cention N might be a better choice for fillings if you're looking for longer-lasting esthetics, especially if you enjoy a lot of staining beverages.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2025-12-05
Section
Articles
License

All articles published by The Parthenon Frontiers and its associated journals are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License unless otherwise stated. 

Authors retain full copyright of their published work. By submitting their manuscript, authors agree to grant The Parthenon Frontiers a non-exclusive license to publish, archive, and distribute the article worldwide. Authors are free to:

  • Share their article on personal websites, institutional repositories, or social media platforms.

  • Reuse their content in future works, presentations, or educational materials, provided proper citation of the original publication.

How to Cite

An In Vitro Assessment of Chromatic Stability in Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and A Bioactive Alkasite Restorative Material. (2025). European Journal of Emerging Dental Research, 1(01), 1-10. https://parthenonfrontiers.com/index.php/ejedr/article/view/211

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.