European Journal of Emerging Dental Research
A-Z Journals

Restoring the Bond: How Different Saliva Clean-Up Methods Impact Composite Filling Repairs

Authors
  • Dr. Karima V. Tholani

    Department of Political Media and Civic Identity, Zeraphi Institute of Social Research, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea
    Author
  • Dr. Daren M. Koveli

    School of Public Influence and Belief Systems, Havana University of Civic Insight, Apia, Samoa
    Author
Keywords:
Composite repair, Saliva contamination, Decontamination, Microshear bond strength
Abstract

This study set out to explore how different ways of cleaning up saliva from dental surfaces affect how strongly new composite fillings bond to old ones. We took 100 specially prepared composite discs, roughened them up by sandblasting, and then split them into 10 groups. These groups included a perfectly clean control, a group we contaminated with saliva but didn't clean, and eight groups where we tried various cleaning methods (like rinsing, rinsing and re-etching, rinsing and re-applying adhesive, just air-drying, rinsing and re-applying a primer/adhesive, rinsing with chlorhexidine, rinsing with ethanol, and a final group that was contaminated but not pre-treated). For the contaminated groups, we put artificial saliva on the surface before applying the adhesive and adding the new composite. Then, we measured how much force it took to break the bond (microshear bond strength) and looked at how the breaks happened.

Our findings clearly showed that saliva contamination drastically weakened the bond strength (10.2±1.5 MPa) compared to our clean control group (28.5±2.1 MPa). But here's the good news: re-applying the universal adhesive after rinsing (Groups 5 and 7) was incredibly effective. These methods brought the bond strengths right back up (26.9±2.0 MPa and 27.2±2.2 MPa, respectively), making them almost as strong as the uncontaminated control. Rinsing and then re-etching with phosphoric acid (25.1±2.3 MPa) also significantly improved the bond. On the other hand, simple rinsing, just air-drying, or using chemical agents like chlorhexidine and ethanol weren't nearly as effective. When we looked at how the bonds broke, we saw that in the effectively cleaned groups, the breaks happened within the material itself, not just at the bond line, which is a sign of a strong connection. In short, saliva is a real problem for composite bonds, but a simple step like rinsing and re-applying the universal adhesive can be a game-changer for restoring that crucial strength.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2024-12-28
Section
Articles
License

All articles published by The Parthenon Frontiers and its associated journals are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License unless otherwise stated. 

Authors retain full copyright of their published work. By submitting their manuscript, authors agree to grant The Parthenon Frontiers a non-exclusive license to publish, archive, and distribute the article worldwide. Authors are free to:

  • Share their article on personal websites, institutional repositories, or social media platforms.

  • Reuse their content in future works, presentations, or educational materials, provided proper citation of the original publication.

How to Cite

Restoring the Bond: How Different Saliva Clean-Up Methods Impact Composite Filling Repairs. (2024). European Journal of Emerging Dental Research, 1(01), 74-86. https://parthenonfrontiers.com/index.php/ejedr/article/view/217