THE INTERPLAY OF SENIOR LEADERSHIP AND SOCIETAL ORIENTATIONS ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IMPLEMENTATION WITHIN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: A COMPREHENSIVE CASE STUDY
Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR Implementation, Multinational Corporations, Senior LeadershipAbstract
This comprehensive case study delves into the intricate relationship between the orientations of senior leadership teams, the multifaceted expectations of diverse societies, and their collective impact on the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) within multinational corporations (MNCs). Employing a mixed-methods qualitative and quantitative case study approach, this research meticulously examines "GlobalTech Solutions," an MNC with a substantial global footprint and a history of both lauded CSR initiatives and significant controversies. Data was rigorously collected through extensive semi-structured interviews with a broad spectrum of internal stakeholders (senior leadership, managers, employees) and external stakeholders (NGO representatives, community leaders, government officials), complemented by a thorough analysis of corporate reports, financial statements, and public documents. Quantitative data, gathered via surveys, was analyzed using statistical methods such as the Mann-Whitney U test to ascertain the philosophical alignment of different stakeholder groups.
Findings reveal a pronounced divergence in leadership orientations, categorized broadly into economic/compliance-driven versus values-based/integrative perspectives, mirroring different priorities and drivers for CSR engagement. Concurrently, societal expectations exhibited considerable variation across geographical operating regions, ranging from demanding comprehensive ESG performance in developed markets to prioritizing fundamental social and economic development needs in emerging economies. This pervasive misalignment between internal leadership priorities and external societal demands often culminates in a phenomenon known as "decoupling," where formal CSR policies are ceremonially adopted to project legitimacy, but actual, impactful practices on the ground remain inconsistent or underdeveloped, thereby eroding stakeholder trust and diminishing the tangible benefits of CSR. Conversely, contexts characterized by a strong alignment between leadership's authentic commitment and responsive societal demands foster more deeply embedded, proactive, and impactful CSR initiatives. The study empirically substantiates that effective CSR implementation in MNCs necessitates not only robust leadership commitment but also a profound adaptability to diverse institutional contexts, coupled with genuine, two-way stakeholder engagement. It emphatically highlights the imperative for MNCs to cultivate a nuanced, context-sensitive approach that judiciously balances global strategic consistency with localized operational responsiveness, moving beyond mere symbolic gestures to achieve authentic and sustainable corporate citizenship.
References
1. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525.
2. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.
3. Ahmad, H., Yaqub, M., & Lee, S. H. (2024). Environmental, Social, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: A Scientometric Review of Global Trends. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(2), 2965–2987.
4. Aravossis, K. G. & Panayiotou, K. A. (2006). A Proposed Methodological Framework for the Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility, Department of Industrial Management and Operational Research, National Technical University of Athens, Athínai, Attica, Greece. Conference: 1st International Conference on Environmental Economics and Investment Assessment, At Mykonos Greece. 5. https://doi.org/10.2495/EEIA060091.
5. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.
6. Baumann-Pauly, D., Wickert, C., Spence, L., & Scherer, A. (2013). Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large frms: Size matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 693–705.
7. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing Better at Doing Good: When, why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives’. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–25.
8. Blake R. Grossman and William F. Sharpe, (1986). Financial Implications of South African Divestment, Financial Analysts Journal, 42, July/August, pp. 15–29. 1.
9. Boele, R., Fabig, H. & Wheeler, D. (2001). The Story of Shell Petroleum Nigeria PLC, Nigeria and the Ogoni People – Environment, Economy, Relationships: Conflict and Prospects for Resolution. Sustainable Development, 9:74–86.
10. Boele, R., Fabig, H. & Wheeler, D. (2007) The Story of Shell, Nigeria and the Ogoni People – Environment, Economy, Relationships: Conflict and Prospects for Resolution. Sustainable Development, 9:74–86.
11. Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. A. T. (1972). Is Pollution Profitable? Risk Management, 19(4), 9–18.
12. Brunton, M., Eweje, G., & Taskin, N. (2017). Communicating corporate social responsibility to internal stakeholders: Walking the walk or just talking the talk? Business Strategy & the Environment, 26(1), 31–48.
13. Buono, A. F., & Nichols, L. (1985). Corporate Policy, Values, and Social Responsibility. Praeger Scientific.
14. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders”. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
15. Carroll, A. B. & Shabana, K. M. (2010) The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.
16. Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016). Researching corporate social responsibility communication: Themes, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1223–1252.
17. Cupchik, G (2001). Constructivist Realism: An Ontology That Encompasses Positivist and Constructivist Approaches to the Social Sciences. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art 7.
18. Davidson, W. N., & Worrell, D. L. (1988). The Impact of Announcement of Corporate Illegalities on Shareholder Returns. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 195–200.
19. Day, C., Sammons, P., & Gu, Q. (2008). Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Research on Teachers’ Lives, Work, and Effectiveness: From Integration to Synergy. Educational Researcher, 37(6), 330–342.
20. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational felds. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
21. Dobele, A. R., Westberg, K., Steel, M., & Flowers, K. (2014). An examination of corporate social responsibility implementation and stakeholder engagement: A case study in the Australian mining industry. Business Strategy & the Environment, 23(3), 145–159.
22. Drucker, P. F. (1984). The New Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility. California Management Review, 26, 53–63.
23. Fet, A.M. Knudson, H. (2017). Environmental Management from a Systems Perspective. In Abraham, M.A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies (1st ed., pp. 165–173). Elsevier.
24. Fordham, A. E., & Robinson, G. M. (2019). Mapping Meanings of Corporate Social Responsibility: An Australian Case Study. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(1), 14.
25. Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (1999). An Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Pollution Disclosures Included in Annual Financial Statements on Investors’ Decisions. The British Accounting Review, 31(4), 439–457.
26. Freeman, R. E., & Valamuri, R. (2006). A new approach to corporate social responsibility: Company stakeholder responsibility. In A. Kakabadse & M. Morsing (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: Reconciling aspiration with application (1st ed., pp. 9–23). Palgrave Macmillan.
27. Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. New York Times Magazines, 13 September, pp. 32–33.
28. Garriga, E. & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53: 51–71. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
29. Graafand, J., & Smid, H. (2019). Decoupling among corporate social responsibility policies, programs, and impacts: An empirical study. Business & Society, 58(2), 231–267.
30. Hofman, A. (1999). Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the US Chemical Industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.
31. Idowu, S.O, (ed) Schmidpeter, R. (Ed) (2020), CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Switzerland.
32. Jacqueminet, A. & Durand, R. (2013). Managing Levels of corporate social responsibility Implementation Within a Multinational Corporation: Competition and Receptivity. Strategy and Business Policy, HEC Paris.
33. Jarrell, G., & Peltzman, S. (1985). The Impact of Product Recalls on the Wealth of Sellers”. Journal of Political Economy, 93(3), 512–536.
34. Jiang, P. C., Feng, G. F., Wang, H. J., & Chang, C. P. (2024). CSR from diferent perspectives: The global ESG indexes updated. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 4694–4714.
35. Kang, J. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility? Not My Business Anymore: The CEO Horizon Problem in Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 1–6.
36. Keeney, R. L., & Raifa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-ofs. John Niley.
37. Kleine, A., & Hauf, M. (2009). Sustainability-driven implementation of corporate social responsibility: Application of the integrative sustainability triangle. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 517–533.
38. Klonoski, R.J. (1991). Foundational Considerations in the Corporate Social Responsibility Debate. Business Horizons, July–August, 9–18.
39. Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and new Directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994–1006.
40. Kurpierz, J. R., & Smith, K. (2020). The Greenwashing Triangle: Adapting Tools from Fraud to Improve CSR Reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(6), 1075–1093. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2018-0272.
41. Lemon, K. N., Roberts, J. H., Raghubir, P., & Winer, R. S. (2011). Measuring the Efects of Corporate Social Responsibility. A Stakeholder Approach, the Conference Board, 3(7), 4–20.
42. Li, Y., Haleem, F., Cheng, Y., & Farooq, S. (2022). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices on Sustainability Performance in Manufacturing Networks: The Moderating Efect of Interplant Coordination. Production Planning & Control, 33(12), 1182–1196.
43. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Sage.
44. Luo, X. R., Wang, D., & Zhang, J. (2017). Whose call to answer: Institutional complexity and frms’ corporate social responsibility reporting. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 321–344.
45. Mackay, Arevuo, M., Meadows, M., & MacKay, B. (2023). Strategy: Theory, Practice, Implementation (2nd Edition). Oxford University Press.
46. Maon, F., Swaen, V. & Lindgreen, A. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility at IKEA: Commitment and Communication. In C. Smith, C. B. Bhattacharya, D. Vogel & D. Levine (eds.), Global Challenges in Responsible Business: Corporate Responsibility and Strategy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) Forthcoming.
47. Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2016). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of corporate social responsibility practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1), 28–54.
48. Marquis, C., Glynn, M., & Davis, G. (2007). Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social Action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 925.
49. Mazurkiewicz, P. (2004). Corporate Environmental Responsibility: Is a Common corporate social responsibility Framework Possible? in 24th Annual IAIA Conference, Vancouver, BC.
50. Mazurkiewicz, P. (2004b). Corporate Self-Regulations and Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue, in Handbook of Voluntary Environmental Agreements. Kluvert Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.
51. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Jossey-Bass.
52. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
53. Moon, S. G., & de Leon, P. (2007). Contexts and Corporate Voluntary Environmental Behaviors: Examining the EPA’s Green Lights Voluntary Program. Organization Environment, 20(4), 480–496.
54. Mooneeapen, O., Abhayawansa, S., & Mamode Khan, N. (2022). The influence of the Country Governance Environment on Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(4), 953–985.
55. Naeem, N., Cankaya, S., & Bildik, R. (2022). Does ESG Performance Affect the Financial Performance of Environmentally Sensitive Industries? A Comparison between Emerging and Developed Markets. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S128–S140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.014.
56. Nelson, J. S., Megill, A., & McCloskey, D. N. (Eds.). (1987). The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs. University of Wisconsin Press.
57. Ng, T. H., Lye, C. T., Chan, K. H., Lim, Y. Z., & Lim, Y. S. (2020). Sustainability in Asia: The Roles of Financial Development in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance. Social Indicators Research, 150, 17–44.
58. Osadiya, T. (2020). A Critical Review of a Multinational Corporation’s Corporate Social Responsibility Practice – A Case Study. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom. 132–191.
59. Osadiya, T. (2016). Reflecting on Corporate Social Responsibility Discourse. ResearchGate. 1–46. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4393.0648.
60. Philippe, D., & Durand, R. (2011). The impact of Norm Conforming Behaviors on Firm Reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 32(9), 969–993.
61. Polonsky, M., & Jevons, C. (2009). Global branding and strategic corporate social responsibility: An overview of three types of complexity. International Marketing Review, 26(3), 327–347.
62. Pope, S., & Wæraas, A. (2016). corporate social responsibility-washing is rare: A conceptual framework, literature review, and critique. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 173–193. Cited in Tahniyath & Elbanna, 2023.
63. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006a). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advance and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–79.
64. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006b). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.
65. Porter, T. B. (2008). Managerial Applications of Corporate Social Responsibility and Systems Thinking for Achieving Sustainability Outcomes. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25(3), 397–411.
66. Ramchander, S., Schwebach, R. G., & Staking, K. I. M. (2012). The Informational Relevance of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from DS400 Index Reconstitutions. Strategic Management Journal, 33(3), 303–314.
67. Rasche, A., Morsing, M., & Moon, J. (Eds.). (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategy, Communication, Governance. Cambridge University Press.
68. Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). Responding to Public and Private Politics: Corporate Disclosure of Climate Change Strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 11571178. Responsiblity.
69. Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Garde Sánchez, R., & López Hernández, A. M. (2015). Managers as drivers of corporate social responsibility in state-owned enterprises. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 58(5), 777–801.
70. Ryan, G., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data Management and Analysis Methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 769–802). Sage.
71. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.
72. Sandelands, L. E. (2003). The Argument for God from Organization Studies. Journal of Management Enquiry, 20, 1–10.
73. Schoeneborn, D., Morsing, M., & Crane, A. (2019). Formative Perspectives on the Relation Between CSR Communication and CSR Practices: Pathways for Walking, Talking, and T(w)alking. Business & Society, 59(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319845091.
74. Secchi, D. (2007). Utilitarian, Managerial and Relational Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 347–373.
75. Sharma, A., & Kiran, R. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility: Driving Forces and Challenges. International Journal of Business Research and Development, 2(1), 18–27.
76. Shaw, W. H., & Barry, V. (1995). Moral Issues in Business (6th ed.). Wadsworth.
77. Sherer, P. D., & Lee, K. (2002). Institutional Change in Large Law Firms: A Resource Dependency and Institutional Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 102–119.
78. Simpson, B., Robertson, J. L., & White, K. (2002). How Co-Creation Increases Employee Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Engagement: The Moderating Role of Self-Construal. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 97–109.
79. Singhania, M., Saini, N., Shri, C., & Bhatia, S. (2024). Cross-Country Comparative Trend Analysis in ESG Regulatory Framework Across Developed and Developing Nations. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 35(1), 61–100.
80. Smith, M. L. (2006). Multiple Methods in Education Research. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of Complementary Methods in Educational Research (pp. 457–475). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
81. Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How? California Management Review, 45(4), 52–76.
82. Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. SAGE Publications.
83. Svystunove, L., Muratova, Y., Fortwengel, J., & Edwards, T. (2024). Multinational Corporations’ Interactions with Host Institutions: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Management International Review, 64, 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-023-00525-1.
84. Tahniyath, F., & Elbanna, S. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility (corporate social responsibility) Implementation: A Review and a Research Agenda Towards an Integrative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics., 183, 105–121.
85. The Shell Sustainability Report. (2013). Sustainable Development in Shell Project Development Process – Review Stages Between Each Phase (p. 13). Royal Dutch Shell Plc. Netherlands. http://reports.shell.com
86. Tolbert, P., & Zucker, L. (1983). Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Difusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22–39.
87. Verk, N., Golob, U., & Podnar, K. (2021). A Dynamic Review of the Emergence of Corporate Social Responsibility Communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(3), 491–515.
88. Verma, S., Raut, S. K., Narula, R., & Rao, P. (2024). Sustainability and Capability Building in Organizations: A Focused Group Approach. FIIB Business Review, 23197145241269203.
89. Waldman, D. A., & Siegel, D. (2005). The Influence of CEO Transformational Leadership on Firm-Level Commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility. In J. P. Doh & S. A. Stumpf (Eds.), Handbook on responsible Leadership and Governance in Global Business (pp. 195–220). Edward Elgar.
90. Wickert, C., Scherer, A. G., & Spence, L. J. (2016). Walking and talking corporate social responsibility: Implications of firm size and organizational cost. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1169–1196.
91. Yang, Y., yang, B., Aiken, E., Wylie, J., Cadden, T., & Oyedijo, A. (2024). Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Framework for Successful Implementation and Value Creation through Employee Engagement. Production Planning & Control, 1–18. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2024.2358031.
92. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage.