Bridging Digital Divides: Examining Data Mobility and System Compatibility Across Online Platforms

Authors

  • Dr. Elira M. Vastrin Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands Author
  • Dr. Tobias N. Krellan Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Author

Keywords:

Data portability, interoperability, digital platforms, switching costs

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital platforms has profoundly reshaped our economies and daily lives, offering incredible ways to connect and simplify tasks. Yet, this growth also brings significant questions about how much control we, as users, have over our own data and how easily we can move it between different services. This article dives into the crucial topics of data portability and interoperability, exploring what they mean for competition, our well-being as consumers, and the rules governing digital spaces. We'll use established economic ideas about what makes it hard to switch services, how networks grow, and how markets compete to understand the challenges posed by today's dominant digital platforms. We'll discuss the real benefits of being able to move our data around more freely, like sparking new ideas and making markets more dynamic. We'll also look at the tricky parts of making different systems work together smoothly. Finally, we'll touch on how different parts of the world, especially the European Union, are trying to tackle these issues. Ultimately, making data truly portable and systems truly interoperable is vital for preventing unfair practices, empowering us as consumers, and ensuring a vibrant, healthy digital world for everyone.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bagwell, K. 1995. “Commitment and Observability in Games.” Games and Economic Behavior 8: 271–280.

Farrell, J. 1986. “A Note on Inertia in Market Share.” Economics Letters 21: 73–75.

Farrell, J., and G. Saloner. 1992. “Converters, Compatibility, and the Control of Interfaces.” Journal of Industrial Economics 40: 9–35.

Gal, M., and O. Aviv. 2020. “The Competitive Effects of the GDPR.” Journal of Competition Law and Economics 16: 349–391.

Hotelling, H. 1929. “Stability in Competition Harold Hotelling.” Economic Journal 39: 41–57.

Katz, M., and C. Shapiro. 1985. “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility.” American Economic Review 75: 424–440.

Kim, D., and J.‐Y. Kim. 2024. “On the Invariance Result of Liability Rules in Oligopoly.” Review of Law and Economics 20: 439–455.

Klemperer, P. 1987a. “Markets With Consumer Switching Costs.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 375–394.

Klemperer, P. 1987b. “The Competitiveness of Markets With Switching Costs.” Rand Journal of Economics 18: 138–150.

Landes, W. M., and R. A. Posner. 1980. “Joint and Multiple Tortfeasors: An Economic Analysis.” Journal of Legal Studies 9: 517–555.

Polinsky, M. 1980. “Strict Liability vs. Negligence in a Market Setting.” American Economic Review 70: 363–367.

Rubinfeld, D. 2023. “Data Portability and Interoperability: An E.U.‐U.S. Comparison.” European Journal of Law and Economics 57: 163–179.

Rubinfeld, D., and M. Gal. 2017. “Access Barriers to Big Data.” Arizona Law Review 59: 339–381.

Shavell, S. 1980. “Strict Liability Versus Negligence.” Journal of Legal Studies 9: 1–25.

Shavell, S. 1987. Economic Analysis of Accident Law. Harvard University Press.

Wohlfarth, M. 2019. “Data Portability on the Internet.” Business and Information Systems Engineering 61: 551–574.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-04

How to Cite

Bridging Digital Divides: Examining Data Mobility and System Compatibility Across Online Platforms. (2024). European Journal of Emerging Economics and Management, 1(01), 1-9. https://parthenonfrontiers.com/index.php/ejeem/article/view/51

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.