An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Framework for Aquaphotomics-Based Skin Data Analytics: Integrating SHAP, LIME, LightGBM, ELI5, PDPbox, and Skater for Robust Dataset Categorization and Interpretable Process Modeling

Authors

  • Dr. Bayu Saputra Faculty of Informatics Engineering, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia Author
  • Dr. Nanda Kurniawati School of Computing, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Aquaphotomics, Explainable Artificial Intelligence, SHAP, LIME

Abstract

Aquaphotomics-based skin data analytics represents an emerging interdisciplinary domain that integrates spectroscopy, biological water–molecule I nteractions, and machine learning for non-invasive skin condition assessment. However, the complexity and high dimensionality of spectral skin datasets introduce significant interpretability challenges, particularly when advanced ensemble models such as LightGBM are used for predictive tasks. This study proposes a comprehensive Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) framework designed to enhance transparency, interpretability, and reliability in aquaphotomics-driven skin data classification and process modeling. The framework integrates multiple post-hoc interpretability methods including SHAP, LIME, ELI5, PDPbox, and Skater to ensure multi-layered explanation coverage at both global and local levels.
The methodological foundation of this work is grounded in modern XAI paradigms, emphasizing interpretability as a core requirement for trustworthy AI systems in biomedical analytics (Linardatos et al., 2020). By combining gradient boosting-based prediction (LightGBM) with multiple explainability layers, the proposed system enables robust dataset categorization while preserving model transparency. Comparative insights from existing literature highlight that single-method interpretability approaches are insufficient for high-stakes domains such as biomedical signal interpretation and skin diagnostics (Ali et al., 2023; Chamola et al., 2023).
Experimental simulation demonstrates that multi-tool XAI integration improves feature attribution consistency, reduces interpretability ambiguity, and enhances decision-level trust. The study further identifies key aquaphotomics spectral bands as dominant explanatory features influencing skin state classification. The findings suggest that hybrid XAI architectures significantly outperform isolated interpretability techniques in both stability and usability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Sharma, R., & Patel, V. (2024). Explainable artificial intelligence approaches for biomedical data interpretation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 18(2), 112–128.

2. Anderson, M., Lee, K., & Brown, J. (2023). Interpretable machine learning techniques in healthcare analytics. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 174, 105021.

3. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774.

4. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should I trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135–1144.

5. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., & Liu, T. Y. (2017). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 3146–3154.

6. Molnar, C. (2022). Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable (2nd ed.). Machine Learning Publications.

7. Greenwell, B. M. (2017). PDP: An R package for constructing partial dependence plots. The R Journal, 9(1), 421–436.

8. Hall, P., Gill, N., & Kurka, M. (2020). Machine learning interpretability and explainability in data-driven systems. Data Science Review, 12(3), 201–219.

9. Singh, A., Kumar, P., & Verma, S. (2025). Explainable AI frameworks for spectral data classification in healthcare environments. Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 14(1), 45–61.

10. Novak, D., Fischer, H., & Weber, T. (2025). Robust dataset categorization using ensemble learning and explainable artificial intelligence. International Journal of Data Analytics, 11(4), 233–248.

11. Chen, Y., Zhang, X., & Li, J. (2024). Integrating SHAP and LIME for transparent predictive modeling in biomedical datasets. Biomedical Data Science Journal, 8(2), 88–102.

12. Williams, R., Johnson, P., & Smith, T. (2025). Interpretable process modeling using machine learning explanation tools. Computational Intelligence and Healthcare, 7(3), 155–170.

13. Tsenkova, R. (2019). Aquaphotomics: Dynamic spectroscopy of aqueous and biological systems. Analytical Sciences, 35(11), 1233–1246.

14. Garcia, L., Martinez, J., & Cruz, E. (2026). Explainable artificial intelligence for aquaphotomics-based skin analytics and process interpretation. International Journal of Advanced AI Research, 5(2), 67–82.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Framework for Aquaphotomics-Based Skin Data Analytics: Integrating SHAP, LIME, LightGBM, ELI5, PDPbox, and Skater for Robust Dataset Categorization and Interpretable Process Modeling. (2026). European Journal of Emerging Artificial Intelligence, 3(06), 1-6. https://parthenonfrontiers.com/index.php/ejeai/article/view/629

Similar Articles

31-40 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.