Security Threat Modeling for Federated Identity Systems: A STRIDE-Based Assessment of SSO and MFA Vulnerabilities
Keywords:
Federated Identity, Single Sign-On, Multi-Factor Authentication, STRIDEAbstract
Federated identity systems have become a central mechanism for enabling single sign-on (SSO), multi-application authentication, and multi-factor authentication (MFA) across organizational and service boundaries. Their security value, however, depends not only on the strength of individual authentication mechanisms but also on the integrity of trust relationships, identity assertions, authentication workflows, session management, and federation infrastructure. This research develops a STRIDE-oriented threat-modeling approach for assessing security vulnerabilities in federated SSO and MFA environments. The study adopts a structured analytical methodology consisting of system decomposition, trust-boundary identification, threat categorization, vulnerability assessment, and control mapping. Because the supplied literature is primarily concentrated on statistical modeling, machine learning, financial systems, and explainability rather than federated identity security, the analysis explicitly treats these sources as methodological foundations rather than direct empirical evidence of specific identity attacks. In particular, concepts concerning sequential modeling, uncertainty, smoothing, and black-box explainability are used to inform the analytical structure of threat identification and prioritization. The study finds that federated identity architectures create concentrated security dependencies: compromise of an identity provider, federation endpoint, token-validation mechanism, or MFA workflow can propagate across multiple relying applications. STRIDE analysis further indicates that spoofing, tampering, repudiation, information disclosure, denial of service, and elevation of privilege can occur across different layers of the authentication lifecycle. The research contributes a systematic conceptual model for integrating STRIDE with federated SSO and MFA risk analysis and identifies opportunities for adaptive, explainable, and uncertainty-aware security assessment.
Downloads
References
1. Agarwal S, Chomsisengphet S, Kiefer H, Kiefer LC, Medina PC (2020). Inequality during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of savings from mortgage refinancing. Available at SSRN 3750133.
2. Aldridge I, Avellaneda M (2019). Neural networks in finance: Design and performance. The Journal of Financial Data Science, 1(4): 39–62.
3. Bengio Y, Frasconi P (1995). An input output HMM architecture. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 7, 427–434.
4. Bengio Y, Frasconi P (1996). Input-output HMMs for sequence processing. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 7(5): 1231–1249.
5. Berger DW, Milbradt K, Tourre F, Vavra J (2018). Mortgage prepayment and path-dependent effects of monetary policy. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
6. Fang L, Chen Y, Zhong W, Ma P (2024). Bayesian knowledge distillation: A bayesian perspective of distillation with uncertainty quantification. In: Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 12935–12956.
7. Federal Housing Finance Agency (2024). Prepayment Monitoring Report: First Quarter 2024. Technical report, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
8. Freddie Mac (2024). Primary Mortgage Market Survey (PMMS).
9. Fuster A, Hizmo A, Lambie-Hanson L, Vickery J, Willen PS (2021). How resilient is mortgage credit supply? evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
10. Ganapathy, S. K. . (2024). Threat Modeling for Federated SSO and MFA Systems: STRIDE-Based Analysis of Attack Vectors. International Journal of Data Science and Machine Learning, 4(02), 55-73.
11. Gu C (2013). Smoothing Spline ANOVA Models, volume 297. Springer.
12. Gu C (2014). Smoothing spline ANOVA models: R package gss. Journal of Statistical Software, 58: 1–25.
13. Gu C, Ma P (2005). Optimal smoothing in nonparametric mixed-effect models. The Annals of Statistics, 33(3): 1357–1379.
14. Gu C, Wahba G (1991). Minimizing GCV/GML scores with multiple smoothing parameters via the Newton method. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 12(2): 383–398.
15. Guidotti R, Monreale A, Ruggieri S, Turini F, Giannotti F, Pedreschi D (2018). A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(5): 1–42.
16. Ganapathy, S. K. (2024). Threat Modeling for Federated SSO and MFA Systems: STRIDE-Based Analysis of Attack Vectors. International Journal of Data Science and Machine Learning, 4(02), 55-73. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijdsml/article/view/stride-analysis-sso-mfa
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arjun Mehta (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by The Parthenon Frontiers and its associated journals are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License unless otherwise stated.
Authors retain full copyright of their published work. By submitting their manuscript, authors agree to grant The Parthenon Frontiers a non-exclusive license to publish, archive, and distribute the article worldwide. Authors are free to:
-
Share their article on personal websites, institutional repositories, or social media platforms.
-
Reuse their content in future works, presentations, or educational materials, provided proper citation of the original publication.