Enhancing Security and Resilience of Browser Fingerprinting Models Against Adversarial Attacks: A Deep Learning Approach

Authors

  • Haruto Nakamura Department of Intelligent Systems Engineering Tokyo Institute of Advanced Technology, Tokyo, Japan Author

Keywords:

Browser Fingerprinting, Deep Learning, Adversarial Attacks, Cybersecurity

Abstract

Browser fingerprinting has emerged as a critical technique for user identification, fraud detection, device authentication, and cybersecurity monitoring. Recent advances in deep learning have significantly improved the accuracy of browser fingerprinting systems by enabling automated feature extraction and complex pattern recognition across browser and device attributes. However, the increasing sophistication of adversarial machine learning techniques has exposed vulnerabilities in these systems, allowing attackers to manipulate browser attributes and evade identification mechanisms. This study examines the security and resilience challenges associated with deep learning-based browser fingerprinting models under adversarial conditions. Drawing upon contemporary research in fairness-aware machine learning, representation learning, optimization, and robustness, the paper proposes a resilience-oriented framework that integrates adversarial training, representation neutralization, distribution matching, and robust optimization strategies. The study synthesizes theoretical foundations from machine learning robustness literature and applies them to browser fingerprinting environments. Findings indicate that resilient fingerprinting systems require a balance between predictive performance, robustness, fairness, and adaptability. The proposed framework demonstrates how deep learning architectures can be strengthened against evasion attacks while maintaining identification accuracy and operational reliability. The research contributes a comprehensive perspective on securing browser fingerprinting models in increasingly hostile digital environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. F. Calmon, D. Wei, B. Vinzamuri, K. Natesan Ramamurthy, and K. R. Varshney, “Optimized pre-processing for discrimination prevention,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2017, pp. 3992–4001.

2. S. Corbett-Davies, E. Pierson, A. Feller, S. Goel, and A. Huq, “Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness,” in Proc. 23rd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Mining, 2017, pp. 797–806.

3. C. Dwork, M. Hardt, T. Pitassi, O. Reingold, and R. Zemel, “Fairness through awareness,” in Proc. 3rd Innov. Theor. Comput. Sci. Conf., 2012, pp. 214–226.

4. M. Du, F. Yang, N. Zou, and X. Hu, “Fairness in deep learning: A computational perspective,” IEEE Intell. Syst., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 25–34, Jul./Aug. 2021.

5. M. Du, S. Mukherjee, G. Wang, R. Tang, A. Awadallah, and X. Hu, “Fairness via representation neutralization,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2021, pp. 12091–12103.

6. T. Garipov, P. Izmailov, D. Podoprikhin, D. P. Vetrov, and A. G. Wilson, “Loss surfaces, mode connectivity, and fast ensembling of dnns,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2018, pp. 8789–8798.

7. M. Hardt, E. Price, and N. Srebro, “Equality of opportunity in supervised learning,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2016, pp. 3315–3323.

8. T. Hashimoto, M. Srivastava, H. Namkoong, and P. Liang, “Fairness without demographics in repeated loss minimization,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2018, pp. 1929–1938.

9. R. Kuditipudi, “Explaining landscape connectivity of low-cost solutions for multilayer nets,” Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 32, 2019.

10. N. Martinez, M. Bertran, and G. Sapiro, “Minimax pareto fairness: A multi objective perspective,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2020, pp. 6755–6764.

11. F. Prost, H. Qian, Q. Chen, E. H. H. Chi, J. Chen, and A. Beutel, “Toward a better trade-off between performance and fairness with kernel-based distribution matching,” in Proc. 33rd Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. Workshop Mach. Learn. Guarantees, 2019.

12. B. Ustun, Y. Liu, and D. Parkes, “Fairness without harm: Decoupled classifiers with preference guarantees,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2019, pp. 6373–6382.

13. H. Zhao and G. Gordon, “Inherent tradeoffs in learning fair representations,” Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 32, 2019.

14. Ganapathy, S. K. (2025). Beyond Accuracy: Adversarial Robustness of Deep Learning-Based Browser Fingerprinting Systems. Frontiers in Emerging Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 2(12), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.64917/feaiml/Volume02Issue12-03

Downloads

Published

2026-09-17

How to Cite

Enhancing Security and Resilience of Browser Fingerprinting Models Against Adversarial Attacks: A Deep Learning Approach. (2026). European Journal of Emerging Cybersecurity and Information Protection, 3(07), 15-19. https://parthenonfrontiers.com/index.php/ejecip/article/view/795

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)