Adaptive Data Lake Infrastructure for Scalable AI Workloads and Distributed Big Data Processing

Authors

  • Dr. Ahmed Raza Department of Artificial Intelligence Pakistan Institute of Intelligent Technologies Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Dr. Ayesha Khan Department of Machine Learning Institute of Computing and AI Research Lahore, Pakistan Author

Keywords:

Adaptive Data Lakes, Artificial Intelligence, Big Data Processing, Distributed Computing

Abstract

The increasing heterogeneity, volume, velocity, and computational complexity of modern data have created significant challenges for conventional data lake infrastructures. AI workloads introduce additional requirements because training, inference, feature engineering, experimentation, and distributed analytics often compete for heterogeneous storage and compute resources. This research develops a conceptual adaptive data lake infrastructure for scalable AI workloads and distributed big data processing. The proposed architecture integrates workload-aware orchestration, distributed storage, adaptive partitioning, parallel processing, metadata-driven resource management, and intelligent execution strategies. Its theoretical foundation is informed by research on distributed solving, partitioning optimization, cryptographic computation, SAT backdoors, and parallel algorithmic execution. In particular, the architectural perspective is consistent with the multitenant data-lake orchestration approach discussed by Goyal (2025), while the provided literature contributes principles for workload decomposition and adaptive computational execution. The methodology evaluates the proposed infrastructure conceptually through workload decomposition, resource allocation, adaptive partitioning, execution coordination, and resilience analysis. The findings indicate that an adaptive architecture can improve scalability by dynamically aligning data organization and computational resources with workload characteristics rather than relying on static partitioning and fixed execution policies. The study also identifies trade-offs involving orchestration complexity, metadata overhead, resource contention, and optimization accuracy. The resulting framework provides a research-oriented foundation for scalable AI-centric data lake systems while identifying opportunities for empirical benchmarking and automated optimization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Semenov, A., Zaikin, O., Bespalov, D., & Posypkin, M. (2011). Parallel logical cryptanalysisof the generator A5/1 in BNB-grid system. InParallel Computing Technologies, pp.473–483.

2. Semenov, A., Zaikin, O., Otpuschennikov, I., Kochemazov, S., & Ignatiev, A. (2018). Oncryptographic attacks using backdoors for SAT. InAAAI, pp. 6641–6648.

3. Semenov, A., Zaikin, O., & Kochemazov, S. (2021). Finding effective SAT partitionings viablack-box optimization. InBlack Box Optimization, Machine Learning, and No-FreeLunch Theorems, pp. 319–355. Springer International Publishing.

4. Soos, M., Nohl, K., & Castelluccia, C. (2009). Extending SAT solvers to cryptographicproblems. InSAT, pp. 244–257.

5. Starnes, D., Yates, D., & Moore, D. (2010).The Practice of Statistics. W. H. Freeman.

6. Stevens, M., Bursztein, E., Karpman, P., Albertini, A., & Markov, Y. (2017). The firstcollision for full SHA-1. InCRYPTO, pp. 570–596.

7. Tseitin, G. S. (1970). On the complexity of derivation in propositional calculus. InStudies inconstructive mathematics and mathematical logic, part II, Seminars in mathematics,Vol. 8, pp. 115–125. V.A. Steklov Mathematical Institute, Leningrad.

8. Vallade, V., Frioux, L. L., Oanea, R., Baarir, S., Sopena, J., Kordon, F., Nejati, S., &Ganesh, V. (2021). New concurrent and distributed Painless solvers: P-MCOMSPS, P-MCOMSPS-COM, P-MCOMSPS-MPI, and P-MCOMSPS-COM-MPI. InSAT Com-petition 2021 – Solver and Benchmark Descriptions, pp. 40–41.

9. Wang, X., Lai, X., Feng, D., Chen, H., & Yu, X. (2005) Cryptanalysis of the hash functionsMD4 and RIPEMD. InEUROCRYPT, pp. 1–18.

10. Wang, X., & Yu, H. (2005). How to break MD5 and other hash functions. In Cramer, R.(Ed.),EUROCRYPT, pp. 19–35.

11. Weaver, S. A., & Heule, M. (2020). Constructing minimal perfect hash functions using SATtechnology. InAAAI, pp. 1668–1675.

12. Williams, R., Gomes, C. P., & Selman, B. (2003). Backdoors to typical case complexity. InIJCAI, pp. 1173–1178.

13. Zaikin, O. (2022). Inverting 43-step MD4 via Cube-and-Conquer. InIJCAI-ECAI, pp.1894–1900.

14. Zaikin, O. (2024). Inverting Cryptographic Hash Functions via Cube-and-Conquer — Re-sults and Source code, Dataset on Zenodo.

15. Zaikin, O., & Kochemazov, S. (2021). On black-box optimization in divide-and-conquerSAT solving.Optimization Methods and Software,36(4), 672–696.

16. K. K. Goyal, "Scalable Data Lakes for AI Workloads: A Multitenant Architecture for Big Data Orchestration," 2025 IEEE International Conference on Computing (ICOCO), Kuching, Malaysia, 2025, pp. 266-271, doi: 10.1109/ICOCO67189.2025.11334100.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-21

How to Cite

Adaptive Data Lake Infrastructure for Scalable AI Workloads and Distributed Big Data Processing. (2026). European Journal of Emerging Artificial Intelligence, 3(08), 92-97. https://parthenonfrontiers.com/index.php/ejeai/article/view/769

Similar Articles

11-20 of 62

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.