A Novel Hybrid Framework for Unsupervised Clustering Integrating Artificial Neural Network Architectures
Keywords:
Unsupervised Clustering, Artificial Neural Networks, Hybrid Learning Framework, Feature TransformationAbstract
Unsupervised clustering remains a fundamental challenge in machine learning due to the absence of labeled data and the complexity of discovering intrinsic data structures. Traditional clustering techniques such as K-means and hierarchical clustering often suffer from sensitivity to initialization, scalability limitations, and inability to capture nonlinear relationships. In contrast, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in modeling complex patterns but require structured integration to function effectively in unsupervised environments. This study proposes a novel hybrid framework that integrates artificial neural network architectures with classical clustering algorithms to enhance clustering accuracy, robustness, and adaptability. The framework leverages neural feature transformation, adaptive similarity learning, and iterative refinement mechanisms to improve cluster formation. Experimental evaluation is conducted using benchmark datasets, including Iris and Wine datasets, demonstrating superior performance compared to conventional methods. The results indicate significant improvements in cluster cohesion and separation. The proposed approach contributes to the advancement of unsupervised learning by bridging the gap between neural computation and clustering methodologies, offering a scalable and interpretable solution for complex data analysis.
Downloads
References
1. Banerjee P, Chattopadhyay T, Chattopadhyay AK. Comparison among different Clustering and Classification Techniques: Astronomical data-dependent study. New Astron. 2023; 100:101973. doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2022.101973.
2. Darányi A, T. Czvetkó T, Kummer A, Ruppert T, Abonyi J. Multi-objective hierarchical clustering for tool assignment. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2023; 42: 47‒54. doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.02.002.
3. Guan C, Yuen KKF, Coenen F. Particle swarm optimized density-based clustering and classification: Supervised and unsupervised learning approaches. Swarm Evol. Comput. 2019; 44: 876‒896. doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2018.09.008.
4. Hu H, Liu J, Zhang X, Fang M. An Effective and Adaptable K-means Algorithm for Big Data Cluster Analysis. Pattern Recognit. 2023; 139:109404. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109404.
5. Li N, Martin A, Estival R. Heterogeneous information fusion: combination of multiple supervised and unsupervised classification methods based on belief functions. Inf. Sci. 2021; 544: 238‒265. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.07.039.
6. Marini F, Zupan J, Magrì AL. Class-modeling using Kohonen artificial neural networks. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2005; 544(1-2):306‒314. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.12.026.
7. Mutihac L, Mutihac R. Mining in chemometrics. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2008; 612(1):1‒18. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.02.025.
8. Pushkarova Y, Kholin Y. A procedure for meaningful unsupervised clustering and it’s application for solvent classification. Centr. Eur. J. Chem. 2014; 12(5): 594−603. doi: 10.2478/s11532-014-0514-6.
9. Pushkarova Y, Kholin Y. The classification of solvents based on solvatochromic characteristics: the choice of optimal parameters for artificial neural networks. Centr. Eur. J. Chem. 2012; 10(4):1318−1327. doi: 10.2478/s11532-012-0060-z.
10. Pushkarova YN, Sledzevskaya AB, Panteleimonov AV, Titova NP, Yurchenko OI, Ivanov VV, et al. Identification of water samples from different springs and rivers of Kharkiv: Comparison of methods for multivariate data analysis. Mosc. Univ. Chem. Bull. 2013; 68(1):60−66. doi: 10.3103/S0027131412060077.
11. UCI Machine Learning Repository. Center for Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems. Iris Data Set[Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 August 11]. Available from: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Iris.
12. UCI Machine Learning Repository. Center for Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems. Wine Data Set[Internet]. 1994 [cited 2023 August 11]. Available from: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/wine.
13. Wong Tzu-Ts. Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation. Pattern Recognit. 2015; 48(9):2839‒2846. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2015.03.009.
14. Zhao X, Nie F, Wang R, Li X. Improving projected fuzzy K-means clustering via robust learning. Neurocomputing. 2022; 491:34‒43. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.03.043.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Andre Setiawan, Dr. Sari Wulandari (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by The Parthenon Frontiers and its associated journals are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License unless otherwise stated.
Authors retain full copyright of their published work. By submitting their manuscript, authors agree to grant The Parthenon Frontiers a non-exclusive license to publish, archive, and distribute the article worldwide. Authors are free to:
-
Share their article on personal websites, institutional repositories, or social media platforms.
-
Reuse their content in future works, presentations, or educational materials, provided proper citation of the original publication.