Architecture-Oriented Study of Quantum Computing Advancements and Strategic Initiatives in Europe
Keywords:
Quantum Computing Architecture, European Quantum Initiatives, Hybrid Systems, Quantum AlgorithmsAbstract
Quantum computing has emerged as a transformative computational paradigm with the potential to redefine problem-solving across scientific, industrial, and governmental domains. Europe has positioned itself as a key contributor to this technological evolution through coordinated research frameworks, infrastructure investments, and policy-driven initiatives. This paper presents an architecture-oriented study of quantum computing advancements in Europe, focusing on system-level design, technological integration, and strategic ecosystem development. By synthesizing existing literature, including foundational theories, hardware innovations, algorithmic developments, and policy frameworks, the study develops a structured understanding of European quantum architectures. The research further examines interoperability between quantum and classical systems, the role of quantum accelerators, and the integration of quantum communication infrastructures. A methodological framework is proposed to evaluate architectural maturity, scalability, and resilience. The findings reveal that Europe’s approach emphasizes modular architectures, hybrid quantum-classical systems, and secure communication networks, supported by institutional initiatives and collaborative research programs. However, challenges remain in scalability, error correction, and industrial adoption. The study contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive architectural perspective and identifying future research directions for optimizing quantum computing deployment within the European context.
Downloads
References
1. [Aharonov 2007] D. Aharonov et al., “Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation”, SIAM J. Comput. 37 (2007) 166.
2. [ANSSI 2020] “Should Quantum Key Distribution be Used for Secure Communications?”, Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d’information (2020). https://www.ssi.gouv.fr/en/publication/should-quantum-keydistribution-be-used-for-secure-communications/
3. [AQT] Alpine Quantum Technologies. https://www.aqt.eu/
4. [Arute 2019] F. Arute et al., “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor”, Nature 574 (2019) 505.
5. [Babbush 2014] R. Babbush, P. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, “Adiabatic Quantum Simulation of Quantum Chemistry”, Sci. Rep. 4 (2014) 660.
6. [Barzen 2020] J. Barzen and F. Leymann, “Quantum humanities: a vision for quantum computing in digital humanities”, ICS Softw.-Intensiv. Cyber-Phys. Syst. 35 (2020) 153.
7. [Bertels 2021] K. Bertels et al., “Quantum Accelerator Stack: A Research Roadmap”, arXiv 2102:02035 (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.02035
8. [Bobier 2021] J.-F. Bobier et al., “What Happens When ‘If’ Turns to ‘When’ in Quantum Computing?”, Boston Consulting Group report (2021). https://www.bcg.com/publications/2021/building-quantum-advantage
9. [Britt 2017] K.A. Britt and T.S. Humble, “High-Performance Computing with Quantum Processing Units”, J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst. 13 (2017) 39.
10. [Cao 2019] Y. Cao et al., “Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing”, Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 10856.
11. [Camps 2021] D. Camps, R. Van Beeumen, C. Yang, “Quantum Fourier Transform Revisited”, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 28 (2021) e2331.
12. [Castelvecchi 2018] D. Castelvecchi, “The quantum internet has arrived (and it hasn’t)”, Nature 554 (2018) 289.
13. [Cerezo 2021] M. Cerezo et al., “Variational quantum algorithms”, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3 (2021) 625.
14. [Chiribella 2021] G. Chiribella, Y. Yang, R. Renner, “Fundamental Energy Requirement of Reversible Quantum Operations”, Phys. Rev. X 11 (2021) 021014.
15. [Cho 2020] A. Cho, “The biggest flipping challenge in quantum computing”, Science news feature.
16. [Cincio 2021] L. Cincio et al., “Machine Learning of Noise-Resilient Quantum Circuits”, PRX Quantum 2 (2021) 010324.
17. [D-Wave] https://www.dwavesys.com/
18. [D-Wave 2017] “Computational Power Consumption and Speedup”, D-Wave White Paper Series 14-1005A-D (2017) https://www.dwavesys.com/media/ivelyjij/14-1005a_d_wp_computational_power_consumption_and_speedup.pdf
19. [Daiss 2021] S. Daiss et al., “A quantum-logic gate between distant quantum-network modules”, Science 371 (2021) 614.
20. [Dalyac 2021] C. Dalyac et al., “Qualifying quantum approaches for hard industrial optimization problems. A case study in the field of smart-charging of electric vehicles”, EPJ Quantum Technol. 8 (2021) 12.
21. [Dervovic 2018] D. Dervovic et al., “Quantum linear systems algorithms: a primer”, arXiv 1802.08227 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08227
22. [Deutsch 1985] D. Deutsch, “Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 400 (1985) 97.
23. [Devitt 2013] S.J. Devitt, W.J. Munro, K. Nemoto, "Quantum error correction for beginners." Rep. Prog. Phys. 76 (2013) 076001.
24. [DiVincenzo 2000] D.P. DiVincenzo, "The physical implementation of quantum computation." Fortschr. Phys. 48 (2000) 771–783.
25. [Doherty 2021] M. Doherty, “Quantum accelerators: a new trajectory of quantum computers”, Digitale Welt 5 (2021) 74.
26. [Dunjko 2020] V. Dunjko, P. Wittek, “A non-review of Quantum Machine Learning: trends and explorations”, Quantum Views 4 (2020) 32.
27. [Emani 2021] P.S. Emani et al., “Quantum computing at the frontiers of biological sciences”, Nat. Methods 18 (2021) 701.
28. [ENISA 2021] “Post-Quantum Cryptography: Current state and quantum mitigation”, European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (2021). https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/post-quantum-cryptography-currentstate-and-quantum-mitigation
29. [ETHZ 2021] “ETH Zurich and PSI found Quantum Computing Hub”, ETH Zürich press release (2021). https://ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2021/05/eth-zurich-and-psi-found-quantum-computinghub.html
30. [EuroCC] https://www.eurocc-access.eu/
31. [EuroQCI] The European Quantum Communication Infrastructure (EuroQCI) Initiative. https://digitalstrategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-quantum-communication-infrastructure-euroqci
32. [ESA 2021] “Quantum communication in space moves ahead”, European Space Agency. https://www.esa.int/Applications/Telecommunications_Integrated_Applications/Quantum_communication_in_space_moves_ahead
33. [Fu 2016] X. Fu et al., "A Heterogeneous Quantum Computer Architecture", Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers (2016).
34. [Fösel 2021] T. Fösel et al., “Quantum circuit optimization with deep reinforcement learning”, arXiv 2103.07585 (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.07585
35. [Gambetta 2020] J. Gambetta, “IBM’s roadmap for scaling quantum technology”, IBM Research blog (2020). https://www.ibm.com/blogs/research/2020/09/ibm-quantum-roadmap
36. [Gehring 2021] T. Gehring et al., “Homodyne-based quantum random number generator at 2.9 Gbps secure against quantum side-information”, Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 605.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hendra Gunawan, Dr. Fitri Yuliana (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by The Parthenon Frontiers and its associated journals are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License unless otherwise stated.
Authors retain full copyright of their published work. By submitting their manuscript, authors agree to grant The Parthenon Frontiers a non-exclusive license to publish, archive, and distribute the article worldwide. Authors are free to:
-
Share their article on personal websites, institutional repositories, or social media platforms.
-
Reuse their content in future works, presentations, or educational materials, provided proper citation of the original publication.
