EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF DEMOGRAPHIC ATTRIBUTES ON UNDERGRADUATE INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR
Keywords:
Innovative behavior, Undergraduate students, Demographic characteristics, Higher educationAbstract
Innovation stands as a paramount competency for graduates in the 21st century, serving as a cornerstone for both economic advancement and societal well-being. While the cultivation of innovative behavior is a central aim of contemporary higher education, the precise extent to which various demographic characteristics influence this crucial attribute among undergraduate students remains an area requiring deeper investigation. This comprehensive article delves into the intricate relationships between selected demographic attributes—namely gender, age, academic progression (year of study), and chosen field of academic pursuit—and the observed manifestation of innovative behavior among university students. Leveraging established theoretical frameworks concerning creativity and innovation, this study adopts a rigorous quantitative research methodology to systematically analyze survey data gathered from a diverse and substantial sample of undergraduate students. The findings illuminate specific demographic profiles that may exhibit discernible patterns in their levels of innovative behavior, providing invaluable insights for educators, policy architects, and academic institutions. A nuanced understanding of these demographic variations can facilitate the development of more precisely targeted interventions and the strategic design of curricula aimed at fostering a robust and inclusive culture of innovation that effectively caters to the diverse needs and potentials of all students.
References
1. Akram, H., & Abdelrady, A. H. (2025). Examining the role of ClassPoint tool in shaping EFL students’ perceived E-learning experiences: A social cognitive theory perspective. Acta Psychologica, 254, Article 104775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104775
2. Akyüz, E., & Ergol, S. (2022). The challenges experienced by nursing students in clinical learning environment and their suggestions [Hems¸irelik o¨grencilerinin klinik uygulama o¨grenme ortamında yas¸adıkları güçlükler ve onerileri]. Journal of Health and Nursing Management, 9(3), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.54304/SHYD.2022.58561
3. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
4. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
5. Anderson, N., Potoˇcnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
6. Aslan, S., Alyuz, N., Li, B., Durham, L. M., Shi, M., Sharma, S., & Nachman, L. (2025). An early investigation of collaborative problem solving in conversational AI-mediated learning environments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100393
7. Bagheri, A., Aghaei, N., & Chavoshi, S. (2022). The role of creative self-efficacy and employee innovative behaviour. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 921687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921687
8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
9. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
10. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A selfdetermination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
13. Decormeille, G., Geeraerts, T., Descoins, M., & Huet, N. (2025). Screen-based simulation in nursing school: Help use and self-regulated learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70046. Article e70046.
14. Giossi, S., Dagdilelis, V., Koukoufiki, S., & Demertsidis, I. (2014). Teaching entrepreneurship 2.0 in higher education: An innovative approach. The International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum, 20(3), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7963/CGP/v20i03/48967
15. Grubbs, S. J., Chaengploy, S., & Worawong, K. (2009). Rajabhat and traditional universities: Institutional differences in Thai students’ perceptions of English. Higher Education, 57(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9144-2
16. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
17. Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
18. Hoidn, S., & Karkkainen, K. (2014). Promoting skills for innovation in higher education: A literature review on the effectiveness of problem-based learning and of teaching behaviours. OECD Education Working Papers No. 100. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3tsj67l226-en
19. Hu, Y.-H. (2022). Effects and acceptance of precision education in an AI-supported smart learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2013–2037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10664-3
20. Hughes, D., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 548–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
21. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
22. Janssen, O. (2004). How fairness perceptions make innovative behaviour more or less stressful. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.238
23. Karwowski, M., & Sosnowski, M. (2013). Determinants and effects of employee’s creative self-efficacy on innovative activities. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.756688
24. Kwon, K., & Kim, T. (2020). An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behaviour: Revising the JD-R model. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), Article 100704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100704
25. Lopes, C., Bernardes, O., Gonçalves, M. J. A., Terra, A. L., da Silva, M. M., Tavares, C., & Valente, I. (2022). E-learning enhancement through multidisciplinary teams in higher education: Students, teachers, and librarians. Education Sciences (Basel), 12(9), Article 601. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090601
26. Luigi, M., Azzurra, M., & Thi-Thanh-Tam, V. (2022). What drives innovative behavior? An experimental analysis on risk attitudes, creativity, and performance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2022.101868. Article 101868.
27. Mazzucato, M., Lazzarini, S., & Sanna-Randaccio, F. (2023). Framing the main patterns of an academic innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 29(2), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2022-1088
28. OECD. (2021). The OECD learning compass 2030: A framework for future-ready education. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/.
29. Office of the Higher Education Commission. (2018). The 20-year long-term higher education plan B.E.2561-2580 (2018-2037). Bangkok: Prikwan Graphic.
30. Pojsupap, T., Khasasin, R., Kongtanasamut, P., & Prachuabmoh, A. (2020). A synthesis of the theories in innovative behaviour. Modern Management Journal, 18(1), 1–14.
31. Qasim, S. S. (2024). IoT of healthcare innovation solutions for predictable virus detection. Babylonian Journal of Internet of Things, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.58496/BJIoT/2024/015
32. Saengpanya, W. (2018). Psychology of learning and instruction. Chulalonkorn University Press.
33. Saengpanya, W., Upasen, R., & Kaewkohsaba, S. (2021). Creativity quotient of undergraduate students in higher education institutes within Thailand. Journal of Population and Social Studies, 29, 311–324. https://doi.org/10.25133/JPSSV292021.020
34. Saengpanya, W., & Upasen, R. (2025). Creativity: Understanding what factors influence innovative behaviors among undergraduate students in higher education. Creativity studies. (ISSN2345-0479/e-ISSN2345-0487, https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/cs).
35. Sakirin, T., & Said, R. B. (2025). Application of deep learning and transfer learning techniques for medical image classification. Edraak, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.70470/EDRAAK/2025/006
36. Sangsuk, P., & Siriparp, T. (2015). Cause and effect of creative self-efficacy in undergraduate students. An Online Journal of Education, 10(4), 182–195. http://www.edu.chula.ac.th/ojed.
37. Sari, R., Kurniawati, L., & Putri, R. A. (2020). The role of creative self-efficacy as mediating on entrepreneurial leadership and innovative work behavior. Journal of Business and Management, 9(5), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.18332/jbm/124578
38. Saroyan, A. (2022). Fostering creativity and critical thinking in university teaching and learning: Considerations for academics and their professional learning. OECD Education Working Papers No. 280. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/09b1cb3b-en
39. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behaviour: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
40. Shen, Y., Xie, W., Wang, X., Qu, J., Zhou, T., Li, Y., Mao, X., Hou, P., & Liu, Y. (2020). Impact of innovation education on the professionalism of undergraduate nursing students in China. Nurse Education Today, 98, Article 104647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104647
41. Simonton, D. K. (2011). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022912
42. Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A., III (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
43. UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707.
44. Villamil, A., & King, S. (2024). A humane social learning-informed metaverse: Cultivating positive technology experiences in digital learning environments. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 27(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0001
45. Volkovitckaia, G., Tikhonova, Y., & Kolosova, O. (2020). Educational experience in the mobile learning environment: Consumer behaviour perspective. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(21), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i21.18441
46. Wang, C.-C., Chen, H.-C., & Hung, J. C. (2024). Examining learners’ cognitive processes and learning emotions in digital game-based vocabulary learning: Evidence from eye- tracking technology and facial emotion recognition. Interactive technology and smart education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-01-2024-0015
47. Wen, Z., & Zhan, N. (2024). Research on the construction of college career education curriculum system and innovation of teaching methods driven by innovative technology. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-2760. Article 20242760.
48. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour, 4(1), 15–30.
49. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West, & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3–13). Chichester, England: Wiley.
50. Zhang, X., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021). Innovation ecosystem research: Emerging trends and future research. Sustainability (Basel), 13(20), Article 11458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011458
51. Zheng, L., Jiang, F., Gu, X., Li, Y., Wang, G., & Zhang, H. (2025). Teaching via LLMenhanced simulations: Authenticity and barriers to suspension of disbelief. Internet and Higher Education, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100990. Article 100990.
52. Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. In J. J. Martocchio, & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 22, pp. 165–217). Elsevier Science.
53. Zhu, Y. (2022). The impact of digital technology on the optimization of higher education teaching models in an epidemic environment. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, Article 5301459. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5301459
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All articles published by The Parthenon Frontiers and its associated journals are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License unless otherwise stated.
Authors retain full copyright of their published work. By submitting their manuscript, authors agree to grant The Parthenon Frontiers a non-exclusive license to publish, archive, and distribute the article worldwide. Authors are free to:
-
Share their article on personal websites, institutional repositories, or social media platforms.
-
Reuse their content in future works, presentations, or educational materials, provided proper citation of the original publication.
